FTMO currently shows 5 headline account sizes in our review data, from $10,000 up to $200,000. The visible price range runs from €155 to €1,080, but the real cost picture depends on which of the firm's 2 program types you choose: 1-Step Challenge, 2-Step Challenge.
FTMO mainly presents its evaluation fees as upfront challenge purchases rather than recurring monthly subscriptions. There is also a refund signal in the firm's own review data, which means part or all of the entry fee may be returned on the first successful payout depending on the program.
FTMO does not have a verified active discount attached to this review right now, so the list price matters more when you compare it with rival firms.
| Program | Published Price Points |
|---|---|
| 10K Challenge | €155 |
| 25K Challenge | €250 |
| 50K Challenge | €345 |
| 100K Challenge | €540 |
| 200K Challenge | €1080 |
FTMO's extended pricing data shows separate published amounts by program rather than one flat challenge ladder. That matters because the cheapest route into the ecosystem is not always the same as the best value route once you compare drawdown rules and payout terms.
FTMO's value proposition is not just the sticker price. The more relevant question is what you get for the entry cost in terms of account scale, rule flexibility, payout access, and platform fit. In the current dataset, the fee range is €155 to €1,080, the maximum advertised allocation is $200,000, and the firm supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade.
For traders comparing multiple prop firms, that usually means FTMO is strongest when its rule structure and payout terms line up with your style. A cheaper fee can still be the worse deal if the drawdown model or payout cadence is less usable for the way you trade.
FTMO offers 2 challenge formats: 1-Step Challenge, 2-Step Challenge. That makes a big pricing difference because instant programs, one-step programs, and multi-step evaluations usually target different trader profiles and risk tolerances.
Because FTMO is still evaluation-led, traders should compare the cost against the attached profit target, daily loss rule, and payout delay rather than reading the challenge fee in isolation.