BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

Blueberry Funded vs Funding Pips (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare Blueberry Funded against Funding Pips across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

Blueberry Funded logo

Blueberry Funded

8.3/10
80%–85% split·Up to $200,000
Funding Pips logo

Funding Pips

8.2/10
60%–100% split·Up to $300,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, Funding Pips edges out the competition in this matchup. While Blueberry Funded remains an excellent choice for futures traders, forex traders, Funding Pips proves superior due to its easy-to-understand interface and low entry prices from $36.

Quick Comparison

MetricBlueberry FundedFunding PipsWinner
Founded20232022Draw
Overall Rating8.3/108.2/10Blueberry Funded
Profit Split80%–85%60%–100%Funding Pips
Max Account Size$200,000$300,000Funding Pips
Lowest Challenge Fee$97$36Funding Pips
Payout FrequencyBi-weeklyTuesday / bi-weekly / monthly / on demandDraw
Minimum Payout$100$100Draw
PlatformsMT4, MT5, DXtradeMT5, cTrader, Match TraderDraw
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoDraw
Challenge Types23Funding Pips
HeadquartersMelbourne, AustraliaDubai, United Arab EmiratesDraw

Blueberry Funded vs Funding Pips: Challenge Fees Compared

Blueberry Funded offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $97. Funding Pips counters with 5 options starting from $36. Funding Pips is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

Blueberry Funded Fees

$10,000$97
$25,000$205
$50,000$305
$100,000$505
$200,000$1,005

Funding Pips Fees

$5,000$36
$10,000$66
$25,000$158
$50,000$278
$100,000$529

Trading Rules: Blueberry Funded vs Funding Pips

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. Blueberry Funded enforces a max drawdown of 10% and daily drawdown of 4%, with a profit target of 10%. Funding Pips sets a max drawdown at 10% and daily drawdown at 5%, requiring traders to hit 8%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleBlueberry FundedFunding Pips
Max Drawdown10%10%
Daily Drawdown4%5%
Profit Target10%8%
Profit Split80%–85%60%–100%

Platform & Tools Comparison

Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade. Funding Pips provides access to MT5, cTrader, Match Trader. Both firms provide a similar range of platforms.

MT4
Blueberry: Funding:
MT5
Blueberry: Funding:
DXtrade
Blueberry: Funding:
cTrader
Blueberry: Funding:
Match Trader
Blueberry: Funding:

Pros & Cons

Blueberry Funded

Backed by Blueberry Markets (established broker)
Both forex and futures accounts
Modern evaluation experience
Competitive pricing
Weekly payouts
4% daily drawdown (stricter than some)
Newer prop firm division
80% base profit split
Limited challenge types

Funding Pips

Easy-to-understand interface
Low entry prices from $36
Commission boosts at higher volumes
Multiple platform options
Weekly payouts
Base reward split depends on selected payout cycle
Program rules vary by Zero, 1-Step, and 2-Step models
Scaling logic can be confusing for new traders
No personal affiliate manager

Expert Analysis

When placing Blueberry Funded and Funding Pips side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. Blueberry Funded, operating since 2023 out of Melbourne, Australia, has built its model around 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations with a 80%–85% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT4, MT5, DXtrade) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. Funding Pips, headquartered in Dubai, United Arab Emirates since 2022, takes a different approach with Zero and 1-Step models, offering 60%–100% profit sharing on accounts up to $300,000. They support MT5, cTrader, Match Trader across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. The Bottom Line: If you value backed by blueberry markets (established broker), Blueberry Funded is the logical choice. If you prefer easy-to-understand interface and want access to MT5, Funding Pips earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Funding Pips
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Funding Pips
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
Blueberry Funded
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
Blueberry Funded
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Blueberry Funded better than Funding Pips?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **Funding Pips** edges out the competition in this matchup. While Blueberry Funded remains an excellent choice for futures traders, forex traders, Funding Pips proves superior due to its easy-to-understand interface and low entry prices from $36.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: Blueberry Funded or Funding Pips?

Blueberry Funded offers a 80%–85% profit split, while Funding Pips offers 60%–100%. Funding Pips gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: Blueberry Funded or Funding Pips?

Blueberry Funded's lowest challenge fee is $97, while Funding Pips starts at $36. Funding Pips is the more affordable option.

What platforms do Blueberry Funded and Funding Pips support?

Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade. Funding Pips supports MT5, cTrader, Match Trader.

Are Blueberry Funded and Funding Pips legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. Blueberry Funded was founded in 2023 and is based in Melbourne, Australia. Funding Pips was founded in 2022 and is headquartered in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons