BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

FTMO vs Blueberry Funded (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare FTMO against Blueberry Funded across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

FTMO logo

FTMO

9/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
Blueberry Funded logo

Blueberry Funded

8.3/10
80%–85% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, FTMO edges out the competition in this matchup. While Blueberry Funded remains an excellent choice for futures traders, forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Quick Comparison

MetricFTMOBlueberry FundedWinner
Founded20152023Draw
Overall Rating9/108.3/10FTMO
Profit Split80%80%–85%Blueberry Funded
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$155$97Blueberry Funded
Payout FrequencyOn demand after 14 daysBi-weeklyDraw
Minimum Payout$20 bank / $50 crypto$100Draw
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeMT4, MT5, DXtradeFTMO
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoFTMO
Challenge Types22Draw
HeadquartersPrague, Czech RepublicMelbourne, AustraliaDraw

FTMO vs Blueberry Funded: Challenge Fees Compared

FTMO offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $155. Blueberry Funded counters with 5 options starting from $97. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

FTMO Fees

$10,000€155
$25,000€250
$50,000€345
$100,000€540
$200,000€1,080

Blueberry Funded Fees

$10,000$97
$25,000$205
$50,000$305
$100,000$505
$200,000$1,005

Trading Rules: FTMO vs Blueberry Funded

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. FTMO enforces a max drawdown of 10% trailing / 10% static and daily drawdown of 3% / 5%, with a profit target of 10% / 10% + 5%. Blueberry Funded sets a max drawdown at 10% and daily drawdown at 4%, requiring traders to hit 10%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleFTMOBlueberry Funded
Max Drawdown10% trailing / 10% static10%
Daily Drawdown3% / 5%4%
Profit Target10% / 10% + 5%10%
Profit Split80%80%–85%

Platform & Tools Comparison

FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. Blueberry Funded provides access to MT4, MT5, DXtrade. FTMO offers more platform variety.

MT4
FTMO: Blueberry:
MT5
FTMO: Blueberry:
cTrader
FTMO: Blueberry:
DXtrade
FTMO: Blueberry:

Pros & Cons

FTMO

One of the most established prop firms (since 2015)
Paid out over $500 million in rewards
Now offering both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations
Up to 90% profit split with scaling
Wide range of tradeable instruments
2-step evaluation process takes longer
Strict daily drawdown rules (5%)
No news trading on some accounts
Higher challenge fees compared to newer firms

Blueberry Funded

Backed by Blueberry Markets (established broker)
Both forex and futures accounts
Modern evaluation experience
Competitive pricing
Weekly payouts
4% daily drawdown (stricter than some)
Newer prop firm division
80% base profit split
Limited challenge types

Expert Analysis

When placing FTMO and Blueberry Funded side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. FTMO, operating since 2015 out of Prague, Czech Republic, has built its model around 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge evaluations with a 80% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks. Blueberry Funded, headquartered in Melbourne, Australia since 2023, takes a different approach with 1-Step and 2-Step models, offering 80%–85% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT4, MT5, DXtrade across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. The Bottom Line: If you value one of the most established prop firms (since 2015), FTMO is the logical choice. If you prefer backed by blueberry markets (established broker) and want access to MT4, Blueberry Funded earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Blueberry Funded
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Blueberry Funded
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FTMO
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FTMO
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FTMO better than Blueberry Funded?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **FTMO** edges out the competition in this matchup. While Blueberry Funded remains an excellent choice for futures traders, forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: FTMO or Blueberry Funded?

FTMO offers a 80% profit split, while Blueberry Funded offers 80%–85%. Blueberry Funded gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: FTMO or Blueberry Funded?

FTMO's lowest challenge fee is $155, while Blueberry Funded starts at $97. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable option.

What platforms do FTMO and Blueberry Funded support?

FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade.

Are FTMO and Blueberry Funded legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. FTMO was founded in 2015 and is based in Prague, Czech Republic. Blueberry Funded was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons