BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

FTMO vs Instant Funding (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare FTMO against Instant Funding across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

FTMO logo

FTMO

9/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
Instant Funding logo

Instant Funding

8.8/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

Both FTMO and Instant Funding are strong prop trading firms with distinct strengths. FTMO is best for forex traders, while Instant Funding excels for forex traders, instant funding seekers. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) or no evaluation required — instant access to capital.

Quick Comparison

MetricFTMOInstant FundingWinner
Founded20152023Draw
Overall Rating9/108.8/10FTMO
Profit Split80%80%Draw
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$155$75Instant Funding
Payout FrequencyOn demand after 14 days14 days after first trade, then weekly (Instant); on demand on evaluation modelsDraw
Minimum Payout$20 bank / $50 crypto$100Draw
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeMT5, cTrader, Match-TraderFTMO
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoFTMO
Challenge Types24Instant Funding
HeadquartersPrague, Czech RepublicLondon, United KingdomDraw

FTMO vs Instant Funding: Challenge Fees Compared

FTMO offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $155. Instant Funding counters with 5 options starting from $75. Instant Funding is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

FTMO Fees

$10,000€155
$25,000€250
$50,000€345
$100,000€540
$200,000€1,080

Instant Funding Fees

$1,250$75
$2,500$135
$5,000$245
$25,000$445
$100,000$945

Trading Rules: FTMO vs Instant Funding

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. FTMO enforces a max drawdown of 10% trailing / 10% static and daily drawdown of 3% / 5%, with a profit target of 10% / 10% + 5%. Instant Funding sets a max drawdown at 6% and daily drawdown at 3%, requiring traders to hit None (Instant). Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleFTMOInstant Funding
Max Drawdown10% trailing / 10% static6%
Daily Drawdown3% / 5%3%
Profit Target10% / 10% + 5%None (Instant)
Profit Split80%80%

Platform & Tools Comparison

FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. Instant Funding provides access to MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader. FTMO offers more platform variety.

MT4
FTMO: Instant:
MT5
FTMO: Instant:
cTrader
FTMO: Instant:
DXtrade
FTMO: Instant:
Match-Trader
FTMO: Instant:

Pros & Cons

FTMO

One of the most established prop firms (since 2015)
Paid out over $500 million in rewards
Now offering both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations
Up to 90% profit split with scaling
Wide range of tradeable instruments
2-step evaluation process takes longer
Strict daily drawdown rules (5%)
No news trading on some accounts
Higher challenge fees compared to newer firms

Instant Funding

No evaluation required — instant access to capital
No time limits or minimum trading days
Partnered with ThinkMarkets (regulated broker)
Multiple program types: instant, 1-phase, 2-phase
Up to 90% profit split
Must reach 5% profit before first withdrawal
Relatively new company (founded 2023)
Instant funding accounts have tighter drawdown limits
Higher fees for instant funding vs evaluation accounts

Expert Analysis

When placing FTMO and Instant Funding side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. FTMO, operating since 2015 out of Prague, Czech Republic, has built its model around 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge evaluations with a 80% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks. Instant Funding, headquartered in London, United Kingdom since 2023, takes a different approach with Instant Funding and 1-Phase models, offering 80% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. The Bottom Line: If you value one of the most established prop firms (since 2015), FTMO is the logical choice. If you prefer no evaluation required — instant access to capital and want access to MT5, Instant Funding earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Instant Funding
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
FTMO
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FTMO
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FTMO
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FTMO better than Instant Funding?

Both FTMO and Instant Funding are strong prop trading firms with distinct strengths. FTMO is best for forex traders, while Instant Funding excels for forex traders, instant funding seekers. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) or no evaluation required — instant access to capital.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: FTMO or Instant Funding?

FTMO offers a 80% profit split, while Instant Funding offers 80%. Both firms offer comparable profit-sharing terms.

Which prop firm is cheaper: FTMO or Instant Funding?

FTMO's lowest challenge fee is $155, while Instant Funding starts at $75. Instant Funding is the more affordable option.

What platforms do FTMO and Instant Funding support?

FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. Instant Funding supports MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader.

Are FTMO and Instant Funding legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. FTMO was founded in 2015 and is based in Prague, Czech Republic. Instant Funding was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons