BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

Blueberry Funded vs FTMO (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare Blueberry Funded against FTMO across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

Blueberry Funded logo

Blueberry Funded

8.3/10
80%–85% split·Up to $200,000
FTMO logo

FTMO

9/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, FTMO edges out the competition in this matchup. While Blueberry Funded remains an excellent choice for futures traders, forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Quick Comparison

MetricBlueberry FundedFTMOWinner
Founded20232015Draw
Overall Rating8.3/109/10FTMO
Profit Split80%–85%80%Blueberry Funded
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$97$155Blueberry Funded
Payout FrequencyBi-weeklyOn demand after 14 daysDraw
Minimum Payout$100$20 bank / $50 cryptoDraw
PlatformsMT4, MT5, DXtradeMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeFTMO
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksFTMO
Challenge Types22Draw
HeadquartersMelbourne, AustraliaPrague, Czech RepublicDraw

Blueberry Funded vs FTMO: Challenge Fees Compared

Blueberry Funded offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $97. FTMO counters with 5 options starting from $155. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

Blueberry Funded Fees

$10,000$97
$25,000$205
$50,000$305
$100,000$505
$200,000$1,005

FTMO Fees

$10,000€155
$25,000€250
$50,000€345
$100,000€540
$200,000€1,080

Trading Rules: Blueberry Funded vs FTMO

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. Blueberry Funded enforces a max drawdown of 10% and daily drawdown of 4%, with a profit target of 10%. FTMO sets a max drawdown at 10% trailing / 10% static and daily drawdown at 3% / 5%, requiring traders to hit 10% / 10% + 5%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleBlueberry FundedFTMO
Max Drawdown10%10% trailing / 10% static
Daily Drawdown4%3% / 5%
Profit Target10%10% / 10% + 5%
Profit Split80%–85%80%

Platform & Tools Comparison

Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade. FTMO provides access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. FTMO offers more platform variety.

MT4
Blueberry: FTMO:
MT5
Blueberry: FTMO:
DXtrade
Blueberry: FTMO:
cTrader
Blueberry: FTMO:

Pros & Cons

Blueberry Funded

Backed by Blueberry Markets (established broker)
Both forex and futures accounts
Modern evaluation experience
Competitive pricing
Weekly payouts
4% daily drawdown (stricter than some)
Newer prop firm division
80% base profit split
Limited challenge types

FTMO

One of the most established prop firms (since 2015)
Paid out over $500 million in rewards
Now offering both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations
Up to 90% profit split with scaling
Wide range of tradeable instruments
2-step evaluation process takes longer
Strict daily drawdown rules (5%)
No news trading on some accounts
Higher challenge fees compared to newer firms

Expert Analysis

When placing Blueberry Funded and FTMO side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. Blueberry Funded, operating since 2023 out of Melbourne, Australia, has built its model around 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations with a 80%–85% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT4, MT5, DXtrade) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. FTMO, headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic since 2015, takes a different approach with 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge models, offering 80% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks. The Bottom Line: If you value backed by blueberry markets (established broker), Blueberry Funded is the logical choice. If you prefer one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and want access to MT4, FTMO earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Blueberry Funded
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Blueberry Funded
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FTMO
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FTMO
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Blueberry Funded better than FTMO?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **FTMO** edges out the competition in this matchup. While Blueberry Funded remains an excellent choice for futures traders, forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: Blueberry Funded or FTMO?

Blueberry Funded offers a 80%–85% profit split, while FTMO offers 80%. Blueberry Funded gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: Blueberry Funded or FTMO?

Blueberry Funded's lowest challenge fee is $97, while FTMO starts at $155. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable option.

What platforms do Blueberry Funded and FTMO support?

Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade. FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade.

Are Blueberry Funded and FTMO legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. Blueberry Funded was founded in 2023 and is based in Melbourne, Australia. FTMO was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons