BrokerAnalysis
1
  • Loading...
Match Me
Head-to-Head Comparison

ATFunded vs FTMO (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare ATFunded against FTMO across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

ATFunded logo

ATFunded

7.8/10
Up to 90% split·Up to $200,000
ReviewVisit
FTMO logo

FTMO

9/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
ReviewVisit
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, FTMO edges out the competition in this matchup. While ATFunded remains an excellent choice for forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Quick Comparison

MetricATFundedFTMOWinner
Founded20242015Draw
Overall Rating7.8/109/10FTMO
Profit SplitUp to 90%80%ATFunded
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$99$155ATFunded
Payout FrequencyBi-weeklyOn demand after 14 daysDraw
Minimum Payout$100$20 bank / $50 cryptoDraw
PlatformsMT5, TradeLockerMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeFTMO
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksFTMO
Challenge Types22Draw
HeadquartersSVGPrague, Czech RepublicDraw

ATFunded vs FTMO: Challenge Fees Compared

ATFunded offers 4 account tiers with fees starting from $99. FTMO counters with 5 options starting from $155. ATFunded is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

ATFunded Fees

$10,000From $99
$25,000From $199
$50,000From $299
$100,000From $499

FTMO Fees

$10,000€155
$25,000€250
$50,000€345
$100,000€540
$200,000€1,080

Trading Rules: ATFunded vs FTMO

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. ATFunded enforces a max drawdown of 10% and daily drawdown of 5%, with a profit target of 8% / 5%. FTMO sets a max drawdown at 10% trailing / 10% static and daily drawdown at 3% / 5%, requiring traders to hit 10% / 10% + 5%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleATFundedFTMO
Max Drawdown10%10% trailing / 10% static
Daily Drawdown5%3% / 5%
Profit Target8% / 5%10% / 10% + 5%
Profit SplitUp to 90%80%

Platform & Tools Comparison

ATFunded supports MT5, TradeLocker. FTMO provides access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. FTMO offers more platform variety.

MT5
ATFunded: ✓FTMO: ✓
TradeLocker
ATFunded: ✓FTMO: ✗
MT4
ATFunded: ✗FTMO: ✓
cTrader
ATFunded: ✗FTMO: ✓
DXtrade
ATFunded: ✗FTMO: ✓

Pros & Cons

ATFunded

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog
Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place
Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison
Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like ATFunded
Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture
Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site
Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms
Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

FTMO

One of the most established prop firms (since 2015)
Paid out over $500 million in rewards
Now offering both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations
Up to 90% profit split with scaling
Wide range of tradeable instruments
2-step evaluation process takes longer
Strict daily drawdown rules (5%)
No news trading on some accounts
Higher challenge fees compared to newer firms

Expert Analysis

When placing ATFunded and FTMO side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. ATFunded, operating since 2024 out of SVG, has built its model around 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge evaluations with a Up to 90% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT5, TradeLocker) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. FTMO, headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic since 2015, takes a different approach with 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge models, offering 80% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks. The Bottom Line: If you value now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog, ATFunded is the logical choice. If you prefer one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and want access to MT4, FTMO earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
ATFunded
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
ATFunded
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FTMO
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FTMO
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ATFunded better than FTMO?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **FTMO** edges out the competition in this matchup. While ATFunded remains an excellent choice for forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: ATFunded or FTMO?

ATFunded offers a Up to 90% profit split, while FTMO offers 80%. ATFunded gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: ATFunded or FTMO?

ATFunded's lowest challenge fee is $99, while FTMO starts at $155. ATFunded is the more affordable option.

What platforms do ATFunded and FTMO support?

ATFunded supports MT5, TradeLocker. FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade.

Are ATFunded and FTMO legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. ATFunded was founded in 2024 and is based in SVG. FTMO was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Related Prop Firm Comparisons

FTMO vs Instant Funding
Compare FTMO and Instant Funding side-by-side.
FTMO vs SabioTrade
Compare FTMO and SabioTrade side-by-side.
FTMO vs Earn2Trade
Compare FTMO and Earn2Trade side-by-side.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons

All Prop FirmsCompare Challenges