BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

ATFunded vs Blueberry Funded (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare ATFunded against Blueberry Funded across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

ATFunded logo

ATFunded

7.8/10
Up to 90% split·Up to $200,000
Blueberry Funded logo

Blueberry Funded

8.3/10
80%–85% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, Blueberry Funded edges out the competition in this matchup. While ATFunded remains an excellent choice for forex traders, Blueberry Funded proves superior due to its backed by blueberry markets (established broker) and both forex and futures accounts.

Quick Comparison

MetricATFundedBlueberry FundedWinner
Founded20242023Draw
Overall Rating7.8/108.3/10Blueberry Funded
Profit SplitUp to 90%80%–85%Blueberry Funded
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$99$97Blueberry Funded
Payout FrequencyBi-weeklyBi-weeklyDraw
Minimum Payout$100$100Draw
PlatformsMT5, TradeLockerMT4, MT5, DXtradeBlueberry Funded
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoDraw
Challenge Types22Draw
HeadquartersSVGMelbourne, AustraliaDraw

ATFunded vs Blueberry Funded: Challenge Fees Compared

ATFunded offers 4 account tiers with fees starting from $99. Blueberry Funded counters with 5 options starting from $97. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

ATFunded Fees

$10,000From $99
$25,000From $199
$50,000From $299
$100,000From $499

Blueberry Funded Fees

$10,000$97
$25,000$205
$50,000$305
$100,000$505
$200,000$1,005

Trading Rules: ATFunded vs Blueberry Funded

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. ATFunded enforces a max drawdown of 10% and daily drawdown of 5%, with a profit target of 8% / 5%. Blueberry Funded sets a max drawdown at 10% and daily drawdown at 4%, requiring traders to hit 10%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleATFundedBlueberry Funded
Max Drawdown10%10%
Daily Drawdown5%4%
Profit Target8% / 5%10%
Profit SplitUp to 90%80%–85%

Platform & Tools Comparison

ATFunded supports MT5, TradeLocker. Blueberry Funded provides access to MT4, MT5, DXtrade. Blueberry Funded offers more platform variety.

MT5
ATFunded: Blueberry:
TradeLocker
ATFunded: Blueberry:
MT4
ATFunded: Blueberry:
DXtrade
ATFunded: Blueberry:

Pros & Cons

ATFunded

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog
Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place
Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison
Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like ATFunded
Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture
Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site
Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms
Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Blueberry Funded

Backed by Blueberry Markets (established broker)
Both forex and futures accounts
Modern evaluation experience
Competitive pricing
Weekly payouts
4% daily drawdown (stricter than some)
Newer prop firm division
80% base profit split
Limited challenge types

Expert Analysis

When placing ATFunded and Blueberry Funded side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. ATFunded, operating since 2024 out of SVG, has built its model around 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge evaluations with a Up to 90% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT5, TradeLocker) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. Blueberry Funded, headquartered in Melbourne, Australia since 2023, takes a different approach with 1-Step and 2-Step models, offering 80%–85% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT4, MT5, DXtrade across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. The Bottom Line: If you value now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog, ATFunded is the logical choice. If you prefer backed by blueberry markets (established broker) and want access to MT4, Blueberry Funded earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Blueberry Funded
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Blueberry Funded
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
Blueberry Funded
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
ATFunded
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ATFunded better than Blueberry Funded?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **Blueberry Funded** edges out the competition in this matchup. While ATFunded remains an excellent choice for forex traders, Blueberry Funded proves superior due to its backed by blueberry markets (established broker) and both forex and futures accounts.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: ATFunded or Blueberry Funded?

ATFunded offers a Up to 90% profit split, while Blueberry Funded offers 80%–85%. Blueberry Funded gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: ATFunded or Blueberry Funded?

ATFunded's lowest challenge fee is $99, while Blueberry Funded starts at $97. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable option.

What platforms do ATFunded and Blueberry Funded support?

ATFunded supports MT5, TradeLocker. Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade.

Are ATFunded and Blueberry Funded legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. ATFunded was founded in 2024 and is based in SVG. Blueberry Funded was founded in 2023 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons