BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

FTMO vs Darwinex Zero (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare FTMO against Darwinex Zero across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

FTMO logo

FTMO

9/10
80% split·Up to $200,000
Darwinex Zero logo

Darwinex Zero

8.1/10
Up to 85% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, FTMO edges out the competition in this matchup. While Darwinex Zero remains an excellent choice for forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Quick Comparison

MetricFTMODarwinex ZeroWinner
Founded20152020Draw
Overall Rating9/108.1/10FTMO
Profit Split80%Up to 85%Darwinex Zero
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$155$99Darwinex Zero
Payout FrequencyOn demand after 14 daysMonthlyDraw
Minimum Payout$20 bank / $50 crypto$100Draw
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtradeMT5FTMO
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksForex, Indices, CommoditiesFTMO
Challenge Types21FTMO
HeadquartersPrague, Czech RepublicLondon, United KingdomDraw

FTMO vs Darwinex Zero: Challenge Fees Compared

FTMO offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $155. Darwinex Zero counters with 4 options starting from $99. Darwinex Zero is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

FTMO Fees

$10,000€155
$25,000€250
$50,000€345
$100,000€540
$200,000€1,080

Darwinex Zero Fees

$10,000From $99
$25,000From $199
$50,000From $299
$100,000From $499

Trading Rules: FTMO vs Darwinex Zero

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. FTMO enforces a max drawdown of 10% trailing / 10% static and daily drawdown of 3% / 5%, with a profit target of 10% / 10% + 5%. Darwinex Zero sets a max drawdown at 10% and daily drawdown at 5%, requiring traders to hit 8% / 5%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleFTMODarwinex Zero
Max Drawdown10% trailing / 10% static10%
Daily Drawdown3% / 5%5%
Profit Target10% / 10% + 5%8% / 5%
Profit Split80%Up to 85%

Platform & Tools Comparison

FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. Darwinex Zero provides access to MT5. FTMO offers more platform variety.

MT4
FTMO: Darwinex:
MT5
FTMO: Darwinex:
cTrader
FTMO: Darwinex:
DXtrade
FTMO: Darwinex:

Pros & Cons

FTMO

One of the most established prop firms (since 2015)
Paid out over $500 million in rewards
Now offering both 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations
Up to 90% profit split with scaling
Wide range of tradeable instruments
2-step evaluation process takes longer
Strict daily drawdown rules (5%)
No news trading on some accounts
Higher challenge fees compared to newer firms

Darwinex Zero

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog
Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place
Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison
Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like Darwinex Zero
Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture
Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site
Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms
Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Expert Analysis

When placing FTMO and Darwinex Zero side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. FTMO, operating since 2015 out of Prague, Czech Republic, has built its model around 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge evaluations with a 80% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks. Darwinex Zero, headquartered in London, United Kingdom since 2020, takes a different approach with Trader Evaluation Program models, offering Up to 85% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT5 across Forex, Indices, Commodities. The Bottom Line: If you value one of the most established prop firms (since 2015), FTMO is the logical choice. If you prefer now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog and want access to MT5, Darwinex Zero earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Darwinex Zero
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Darwinex Zero
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
FTMO
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
FTMO
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FTMO better than Darwinex Zero?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **FTMO** edges out the competition in this matchup. While Darwinex Zero remains an excellent choice for forex traders, FTMO proves superior due to its one of the most established prop firms (since 2015) and paid out over $500 million in rewards.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: FTMO or Darwinex Zero?

FTMO offers a 80% profit split, while Darwinex Zero offers Up to 85%. Darwinex Zero gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: FTMO or Darwinex Zero?

FTMO's lowest challenge fee is $155, while Darwinex Zero starts at $99. Darwinex Zero is the more affordable option.

What platforms do FTMO and Darwinex Zero support?

FTMO supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. Darwinex Zero supports MT5.

Are FTMO and Darwinex Zero legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. FTMO was founded in 2015 and is based in Prague, Czech Republic. Darwinex Zero was founded in 2020 and is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons