BrokerAnalysis
Head-to-Head Comparison

Blueberry Funded vs Lark Funding (2026): Which Prop Firm Is Better?

We compare Blueberry Funded against Lark Funding across challenge fees, profit splits, platforms, rules, and payout speed. Read our data-driven breakdown to find out which funded account provider suits your trading style in 2026.

Blueberry Funded logo

Blueberry Funded

8.3/10
80%–85% split·Up to $200,000
Lark Funding logo

Lark Funding

7.9/10
Up to 90% split·Up to $200,000
Our Verdict

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, Blueberry Funded edges out the competition in this matchup. While Lark Funding remains an excellent choice for forex traders, Blueberry Funded proves superior due to its backed by blueberry markets (established broker) and both forex and futures accounts.

Quick Comparison

MetricBlueberry FundedLark FundingWinner
Founded20232024Draw
Overall Rating8.3/107.9/10Blueberry Funded
Profit Split80%–85%Up to 90%Blueberry Funded
Max Account Size$200,000$200,000Draw
Lowest Challenge Fee$97$99Blueberry Funded
Payout FrequencyBi-weeklyBi-weeklyDraw
Minimum Payout$100$100Draw
PlatformsMT4, MT5, DXtradeMT5, Match-TraderBlueberry Funded
InstrumentsForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Indices, Commodities, CryptoDraw
Challenge Types22Draw
HeadquartersMelbourne, AustraliaVancouver, CanadaDraw

Blueberry Funded vs Lark Funding: Challenge Fees Compared

Blueberry Funded offers 5 account tiers with fees starting from $97. Lark Funding counters with 4 options starting from $99. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable entry point. Remember to also factor in profit split, drawdown rules, and payout speed when evaluating total value.

Blueberry Funded Fees

$10,000$97
$25,000$205
$50,000$305
$100,000$505
$200,000$1,005

Lark Funding Fees

$10,000From $99
$25,000From $199
$50,000From $299
$100,000From $499

Trading Rules: Blueberry Funded vs Lark Funding

Understanding the rules is critical before purchasing any challenge. Blueberry Funded enforces a max drawdown of 10% and daily drawdown of 4%, with a profit target of 10%. Lark Funding sets a max drawdown at 10% and daily drawdown at 5%, requiring traders to hit 8% / 5%. Stricter drawdown limits typically indicate a more conservative risk approach.

RuleBlueberry FundedLark Funding
Max Drawdown10%10%
Daily Drawdown4%5%
Profit Target10%8% / 5%
Profit Split80%–85%Up to 90%

Platform & Tools Comparison

Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade. Lark Funding provides access to MT5, Match-Trader. Blueberry Funded offers more platform variety.

MT4
Blueberry: Lark:
MT5
Blueberry: Lark:
DXtrade
Blueberry: Lark:
Match-Trader
Blueberry: Lark:

Pros & Cons

Blueberry Funded

Backed by Blueberry Markets (established broker)
Both forex and futures accounts
Modern evaluation experience
Competitive pricing
Weekly payouts
4% daily drawdown (stricter than some)
Newer prop firm division
80% base profit split
Limited challenge types

Lark Funding

Now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog
Official website and tracked outbound routing are in place
Structured review fields are available for side-by-side comparison
Useful shortlist option for traders comparing newer firms like Lark Funding
Some pricing and rule fields still rely on standardized capture
Program details can change quickly and should be confirmed on the official site
Historical payout and support data is lighter than on older legacy firms
Feature depth varies more by program than on the most established firms

Expert Analysis

When placing Blueberry Funded and Lark Funding side-by-side, two distinct funded-account philosophies emerge. Blueberry Funded, operating since 2023 out of Melbourne, Australia, has built its model around 1-Step and 2-Step evaluations with a 80%–85% profit split and accounts up to $200,000. Their platform offering (MT4, MT5, DXtrade) covers Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. Lark Funding, headquartered in Vancouver, Canada since 2024, takes a different approach with 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge models, offering Up to 90% profit sharing on accounts up to $200,000. They support MT5, Match-Trader across Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto. The Bottom Line: If you value backed by blueberry markets (established broker), Blueberry Funded is the logical choice. If you prefer now included as a full live review page in the prop-firm catalog and want access to MT5, Lark Funding earns our recommendation.

Category Winners

Lowest Entry Cost
Blueberry Funded
Based on the cheapest available challenge fee.
Highest Profit Split
Blueberry Funded
Based on the maximum profit-sharing percentage.
Platform Variety
Blueberry Funded
Assessed by total number of supported trading platforms.
Market Coverage
Blueberry Funded
Determined by the number of tradeable instrument categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Blueberry Funded better than Lark Funding?

After a detailed side-by-side analysis, **Blueberry Funded** edges out the competition in this matchup. While Lark Funding remains an excellent choice for forex traders, Blueberry Funded proves superior due to its backed by blueberry markets (established broker) and both forex and futures accounts.

Which prop firm has a higher profit split: Blueberry Funded or Lark Funding?

Blueberry Funded offers a 80%–85% profit split, while Lark Funding offers Up to 90%. Blueberry Funded gives traders a larger share of profits.

Which prop firm is cheaper: Blueberry Funded or Lark Funding?

Blueberry Funded's lowest challenge fee is $97, while Lark Funding starts at $99. Blueberry Funded is the more affordable option.

What platforms do Blueberry Funded and Lark Funding support?

Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade. Lark Funding supports MT5, Match-Trader.

Are Blueberry Funded and Lark Funding legitimate prop firms?

Yes, both are legitimate prop trading firms. Blueberry Funded was founded in 2023 and is based in Melbourne, Australia. Lark Funding was founded in 2024 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. Always verify the latest terms on each firm's official website before purchasing a challenge.

Still comparing?

Browse all prop trading firm reviews with side-by-side comparisons