

Pepperstone vs OANDA (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare Pepperstone against OANDA across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Verdict: Pepperstone Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Pepperstone** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While OANDA remains an excellent choice for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts, Pepperstone proves superior due to its top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads and exceptional platform choice including tradingview and ctrader.
Pepperstone vs OANDA: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 1996 |
| Overall Rating | 4.8/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $0 (Recommended $200) | $0 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) | 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:500 (Pro) | 1:30 (Retail) | 1:50 (US) | 1:30 (EU/UK) | 1:200 (BVI) |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | No |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| TradingView | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Forex Pairs | 60+ | 70+ |
| Deposit Methods | Bank Transfer, Credit/Debit, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, BPay | Bank Transfer, Debit Card, PayPal |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1-2 business days | 1-3 business days |
| Execution Type | NDD & STP | Market Maker / V2 Engine |
Pepperstone vs OANDA: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between Pepperstone and OANDA, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. Pepperstone offers pricing characterized by $3.50/lot (Razor) alongside 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, OANDA utilizes a model with $5/lot (Core Account) and 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, Pepperstone provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | Pepperstone | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) | 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) |
| Commission Defaults | $3.50/lot (Razor) | $5/lot (Core Account) |
| Execution Model | NDD & STP | Market Maker / V2 Engine |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1-2 business days | 1-3 business days |
Safety & Regulation: Is Pepperstone or OANDA Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both Pepperstone and OANDA are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. Pepperstone is armed with 4 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2010. OANDA, licensed since 1996, counters with 5 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. OANDA holds a slight edge with more top-tier authorities. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

Pepperstone
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)BaFin (Germany)DFSA (Dubai)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CY) / £85,000 (UK)
- Licensed Since: 2010

OANDA
Tier 1- Regulators:CFTC/NFA (US)FCA (UK)ASIC (Australia)CIRO (Canada)MAS (Singapore)
- Investor Protection: FSCS (£85k) / CIPF ($1M CAD)
- Licensed Since: 1996
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. Pepperstone equips its clients with MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView. OANDA, on the other hand, grants access to OANDA Trade, Advanced Charting (TradingView), MT4. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | Pepperstone | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | ||
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: Pepperstone vs OANDA

Pepperstone
Pros
- Top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads
- Exceptional platform choice including TradingView and cTrader
- Award-winning 24/5 customer support
- Deepest liquidity pools for large order execution
- No minimum deposit requirement
Cons
- Educational content is good but not standard-setting
- No proprietary mobile app (relies on MetaQuotes/cTrader apps)
- Lacks robust fixed-spread options

OANDA
Pros
- One of the few reputable brokers serving US retail clients
- Exceptional regulatory footprint globally
- No minimum deposit required
- OANDA fxTrade platform is highly intuitive
- Great historical exchange rate data and tools
Cons
- Does not support MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
- Spreads on Standard account aren't the tightest
- Limited non-forex asset classes for US residents
Expert Verdict: Pepperstone vs OANDA
When we place Pepperstone and OANDA side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. Pepperstone, licensed since 2010, has carved out a massive niche focusing on advanced traders, automated trading & tradingview enthusiasts. Their execution model heavily leans into NDD & STP, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, OANDA, operational out of New York, USA, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts. Their $5/lot (Core Account) commission structure combined with 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads, and you intend to start with a minimum of $0 (Recommended $200), Pepperstone is the logical path forward. If, however, you value one of the few reputable brokers serving us retail clients and require OANDA Trade, OANDA edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
Pepperstone vs OANDA: Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy