Head-to-Head Comparison • Updated February 2026
Pepperstone
Pepperstone
★★★★★ 4.8/5
VS
FP Markets
FP Markets
★★★★★ 4.5/5

Pepperstone vs FP Markets (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?

We compare Pepperstone against FP Markets across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.

Verdict: Pepperstone Wins

After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Pepperstone** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FP Markets remains an excellent choice for ecn traders, scalpers & australian clients, Pepperstone proves superior due to its top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads and exceptional platform choice including tradingview and ctrader.

Beginners: PepperstoneLow Spreads: FP MarketsTrust & Safety: PepperstonePlatform Choice: Pepperstone

Pepperstone vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature
Pepperstone
Pepperstone
FP Markets
FP Markets
Founded20102005
Overall Rating4.8/5.04.5/5.0
Minimum Deposit$0 (Recommended $200)$100
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard)0.0 pips (Raw)
Maximum Leverage1:500 (Pro) | 1:30 (Retail)1:500
MetaTrader 4YesYes
MetaTrader 5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
TradingViewYesNo
Copy TradingYesYes
Forex Pairs60+70+
Deposit MethodsBank Transfer, Credit/Debit, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, BPayCard, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, Crypto
Withdrawal Speed1-2 business daysSame day to 1 business day
Execution TypeNDD & STPECN / DMA

Pepperstone vs FP Markets: Fee Breakdown

When comparing the trading costs between Pepperstone and FP Markets, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. Pepperstone offers pricing characterized by $3.50/lot (Razor) alongside 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, FP Markets utilizes a model with $3/lot (Raw) and 0.0 pips (Raw) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, either broker provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.

Fee TypePepperstoneFP Markets
EUR/USD Spread0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard)0.0 pips (Raw)
Commission Defaults$3.50/lot (Razor)$3/lot (Raw)
Execution ModelNDD & STPECN / DMA
Deposit FeesNoneNone
Withdrawal Speed1-2 business daysSame day to 1 business day

Safety & Regulation: Is Pepperstone or FP Markets Safer?

Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both Pepperstone and FP Markets are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. Pepperstone is armed with 4 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2010. FP Markets, licensed since 2005, counters with 2 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. Pepperstone holds a slight edge in absolute tier-1 licenses. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

Pepperstone
Pepperstone
Tier 1
  • Regulators:
    ASIC (Australia)FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)BaFin (Germany)DFSA (Dubai)
  • Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CY) / £85,000 (UK)
  • Licensed Since: 2010
FP Markets
FP Markets
Tier 1
  • Regulators:
    ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)SVG FSA
  • Investor Protection: Segregated client funds / €20,000 ICF
  • Licensed Since: 2005

Platform & Tools Comparison

The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. Pepperstone equips its clients with MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView. FP Markets, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS. If you rely on TradingView charting, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.

FeaturePepperstoneFP Markets
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
Proprietary EnvironmentYes (IRESS)
Copy Trading Network

Pros & Cons: Pepperstone vs FP Markets

Pepperstone
Pepperstone
Pros
  • Top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads
  • Exceptional platform choice including TradingView and cTrader
  • Award-winning 24/5 customer support
  • Deepest liquidity pools for large order execution
  • No minimum deposit requirement
Cons
  • Educational content is good but not standard-setting
  • No proprietary mobile app (relies on MetaQuotes/cTrader apps)
  • Lacks robust fixed-spread options
FP Markets
FP Markets
Pros
  • True ECN pricing from 0.0 pips
  • ASIC and CySEC regulated
  • cTrader and IRESS platforms
  • Over 10,000 tradable instruments
  • Excellent execution speeds
Cons
  • $100 minimum deposit
  • IRESS platform has additional fees
  • Limited educational content

Expert Verdict: Pepperstone vs FP Markets

David Okonjo
David Okonjo
Chief Market Strategist
As professional analysts in the forex brokerage space, we meticulously test each trading environment.

When we place Pepperstone and FP Markets side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. Pepperstone, licensed since 2010, has carved out a massive niche focusing on advanced traders, automated trading & tradingview enthusiasts. Their execution model heavily leans into NDD & STP, and their platform environment highlights MT4.

Conversely, FP Markets, operational out of Sydney, Australia, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for ecn traders, scalpers & australian clients. Their $3/lot (Raw) commission structure combined with 0.0 pips (Raw) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.

The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads, and you intend to start with a minimum of $0 (Recommended $200), Pepperstone is the logical path forward. If, however, you value true ecn pricing from 0.0 pips and require MT4, FP Markets edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.

Pepperstone vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions

After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Pepperstone** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FP Markets remains an excellent choice for ecn traders, scalpers & australian clients, Pepperstone proves superior due to its top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads and exceptional platform choice including tradingview and ctrader.

Pepperstone features an average EUR/USD spread of 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard), whereas FP Markets sits at around 0.0 pips (Raw). For raw cost efficiency, they are highly competitive with each other.

Beginners need intuitive platforms, low minimum deposits, and great education. Pepperstone requires a minimum deposit of $0 (Recommended $200) and has good education. FP Markets asks for $100 to start and offers average educational materials. Therefore, Pepperstone is arguably the better launchpad for a novice.

Yes, Pepperstone supports MT4, and FP Markets supports MT4.

Yes. Pepperstone is regulated by 4 Tier 1 authorities. FP Markets holds 2 Tier 1 licenses. Both are considered highly secure for retail client capital.

Ready to Start Trading?

Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.

Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.

Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy