Trading Academy
Forex Glossary
Trading Guides
Blog
OctaFX vs FBS (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare OctaFX against FBS across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Verdict: OctaFX Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **OctaFX** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FBS remains an excellent choice for beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders, OctaFX proves superior due to its popular in southeast asia and low minimum deposit.
OctaFX vs FBS: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Overall Rating | 4.1/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $25 | $5 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.6 pips | 0.7 pips (Standard) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:500 | 1:3000 |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | No | No |
| TradingView | No | No |
| Copy Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Forex Pairs | 35+ | 40+ |
| Deposit Methods | Card, Bank, Skrill, Local Banks | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, Local |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1-3 business days | 15-20 minutes |
| Execution Type | ECN | STP |
OctaFX vs FBS: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between OctaFX and FBS, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. OctaFX offers pricing characterized by $0 (Spread only) alongside 0.6 pips spreads. In contrast, FBS utilizes a model with $0 (Spread only) and 0.7 pips (Standard) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, OctaFX provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | OctaFX | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.6 pips | 0.7 pips (Standard) |
| Commission Defaults | $0 (Spread only) | $0 (Spread only) |
| Execution Model | ECN | STP |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1-3 business days | 15-20 minutes |
Safety & Regulation: Is OctaFX or FBS Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both OctaFX and FBS are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. OctaFX is armed with 1 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2011. FBS, licensed since 2009, counters with 2 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. FBS holds a slight edge with more top-tier authorities. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.
OctaFX
Tier 1- Regulators:CySEC (Cyprus)SVG FSA
- Investor Protection: Segregated client funds
- Licensed Since: 2011
FBS
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)IFSC (Belize)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CySEC ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2009
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. OctaFX equips its clients with MT4, MT5, OctaTrader. FBS, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | OctaFX | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (OctaTrader) | Yes (FBS Trader) |
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: OctaFX vs FBS
OctaFX
Pros
- Popular in Southeast Asia
- Low minimum deposit
- Copy trading available
- No commission on most accounts
- Local deposit methods
Cons
- Limited Tier-1 regulation
- Not available in many western countries
- Limited product range
FBS
Pros
- Extremely high leverage up to 1:3000
- Low $5 minimum deposit
- Regular bonus promotions
- Cent accounts available
- Fast local bank deposits
Cons
- Offshore regulation for most clients
- Limited research tools
- Wider spreads on Standard accounts
Expert Verdict: OctaFX vs FBS
When we place OctaFX and FBS side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. OctaFX, licensed since 2011, has carved out a massive niche focusing on southeast asian & indonesian traders. Their execution model heavily leans into ECN, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, FBS, operational out of Belize, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders. Their $0 (Spread only) commission structure combined with 0.7 pips (Standard) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is popular in southeast asia, and you intend to start with a minimum of $25, OctaFX is the logical path forward. If, however, you value extremely high leverage up to 1:3000 and require MT4, FBS edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
OctaFX vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy