

Interactive Brokers vs OANDA (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare Interactive Brokers against OANDA across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Verdict: Interactive Brokers Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Interactive Brokers** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While OANDA remains an excellent choice for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts, Interactive Brokers proves superior due to its access to 150+ markets in 33 countries and lowest margin rates in the industry.
Interactive Brokers vs OANDA: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1978 | 1996 |
| Overall Rating | 4.7/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.1 pips (with commission) | 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:50 (US) | 1:30 (EU) | 1:500 (Pro) | 1:50 (US) | 1:30 (EU/UK) | 1:200 (BVI) |
| MetaTrader 4 | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | No | No |
| cTrader | No | No |
| TradingView | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Forex Pairs | 100+ | 70+ |
| Deposit Methods | Bank Wire, ACH (US) | Bank Transfer, Debit Card, PayPal |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1-3 business days | 1-3 business days |
| Execution Type | Smart Routing / DMA | Market Maker / V2 Engine |
Interactive Brokers vs OANDA: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between Interactive Brokers and OANDA, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. Interactive Brokers offers pricing characterized by $2/lot (Tiered pricing) alongside 0.1 pips (with commission) spreads. In contrast, OANDA utilizes a model with $5/lot (Core Account) and 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, Interactive Brokers provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | Interactive Brokers | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.1 pips (with commission) | 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) |
| Commission Defaults | $2/lot (Tiered pricing) | $5/lot (Core Account) |
| Execution Model | Smart Routing / DMA | Market Maker / V2 Engine |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1-3 business days | 1-3 business days |
Safety & Regulation: Is Interactive Brokers or OANDA Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both Interactive Brokers and OANDA are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. Interactive Brokers is armed with 5 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 1978. OANDA, licensed since 1996, counters with 5 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. They are evenly matched in terms of top-tier trust metrics. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

Interactive Brokers
Tier 1- Regulators:SEC/FINRA (US)FCA (UK)ASIC (Australia)MAS (Singapore)CIRO (Canada)
- Investor Protection: $500,000 SIPC (US) / £85k FSCS (UK)
- Licensed Since: 1978

OANDA
Tier 1- Regulators:CFTC/NFA (US)FCA (UK)ASIC (Australia)CIRO (Canada)MAS (Singapore)
- Investor Protection: FSCS (£85k) / CIPF ($1M CAD)
- Licensed Since: 1996
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. Interactive Brokers equips its clients with Trader Workstation (TWS), IBKR Mobile, Client Portal. OANDA, on the other hand, grants access to OANDA Trade, Advanced Charting (TradingView), MT4. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | Interactive Brokers | OANDA |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (TWS, Client Portal) | |
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: Interactive Brokers vs OANDA

Interactive Brokers
Pros
- Access to 150+ markets in 33 countries
- Lowest margin rates in the industry
- Sophisticated Trader Workstation platform
- Real stocks, options, futures, bonds
- SIPC insurance up to $500k
Cons
- Steep learning curve for TWS
- Monthly activity minimums for some accounts
- Customer support can be impersonal

OANDA
Pros
- One of the few reputable brokers serving US retail clients
- Exceptional regulatory footprint globally
- No minimum deposit required
- OANDA fxTrade platform is highly intuitive
- Great historical exchange rate data and tools
Cons
- Does not support MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
- Spreads on Standard account aren't the tightest
- Limited non-forex asset classes for US residents
Expert Verdict: Interactive Brokers vs OANDA
When we place Interactive Brokers and OANDA side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. Interactive Brokers, licensed since 1978, has carved out a massive niche focusing on professional traders, multi-asset investors & institutions. Their execution model heavily leans into Smart Routing / DMA, and their platform environment highlights Trader Workstation (TWS).
Conversely, OANDA, operational out of New York, USA, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts. Their $5/lot (Core Account) commission structure combined with 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is access to 150+ markets in 33 countries, and you intend to start with a minimum of $0, Interactive Brokers is the logical path forward. If, however, you value one of the few reputable brokers serving us retail clients and require OANDA Trade, OANDA edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
Interactive Brokers vs OANDA: Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy