Head-to-Head Comparison • Updated February 2026
Interactive Brokers
Interactive Brokers
★★★★★ 4.7/5
VS
OANDA
OANDA
★★★★★ 4.6/5

Interactive Brokers vs OANDA (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?

We compare Interactive Brokers against OANDA across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.

Verdict: Interactive Brokers Wins

After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Interactive Brokers** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While OANDA remains an excellent choice for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts, Interactive Brokers proves superior due to its access to 150+ markets in 33 countries and lowest margin rates in the industry.

Beginners: Interactive BrokersLow Spreads: Interactive BrokersTrust & Safety: Interactive BrokersPlatform Choice: Interactive Brokers

Interactive Brokers vs OANDA: Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature
Interactive Brokers
Interactive Brokers
OANDA
OANDA
Founded19781996
Overall Rating4.7/5.04.6/5.0
Minimum Deposit$0$0
EUR/USD Spread0.1 pips (with commission)1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core)
Maximum Leverage1:50 (US) | 1:30 (EU) | 1:500 (Pro)1:50 (US) | 1:30 (EU/UK) | 1:200 (BVI)
MetaTrader 4NoYes
MetaTrader 5NoNo
cTraderNoNo
TradingViewNoYes
Copy TradingNoNo
Forex Pairs100+70+
Deposit MethodsBank Wire, ACH (US)Bank Transfer, Debit Card, PayPal
Withdrawal Speed1-3 business days1-3 business days
Execution TypeSmart Routing / DMAMarket Maker / V2 Engine

Interactive Brokers vs OANDA: Fee Breakdown

When comparing the trading costs between Interactive Brokers and OANDA, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. Interactive Brokers offers pricing characterized by $2/lot (Tiered pricing) alongside 0.1 pips (with commission) spreads. In contrast, OANDA utilizes a model with $5/lot (Core Account) and 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, Interactive Brokers provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.

Fee TypeInteractive BrokersOANDA
EUR/USD Spread0.1 pips (with commission)1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core)
Commission Defaults$2/lot (Tiered pricing)$5/lot (Core Account)
Execution ModelSmart Routing / DMAMarket Maker / V2 Engine
Deposit FeesNoneNone
Withdrawal Speed1-3 business days1-3 business days

Safety & Regulation: Is Interactive Brokers or OANDA Safer?

Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both Interactive Brokers and OANDA are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. Interactive Brokers is armed with 5 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 1978. OANDA, licensed since 1996, counters with 5 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. They are evenly matched in terms of top-tier trust metrics. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

Interactive Brokers
Interactive Brokers
Tier 1
  • Regulators:
    SEC/FINRA (US)FCA (UK)ASIC (Australia)MAS (Singapore)CIRO (Canada)
  • Investor Protection: $500,000 SIPC (US) / £85k FSCS (UK)
  • Licensed Since: 1978
OANDA
OANDA
Tier 1
  • Regulators:
    CFTC/NFA (US)FCA (UK)ASIC (Australia)CIRO (Canada)MAS (Singapore)
  • Investor Protection: FSCS (£85k) / CIPF ($1M CAD)
  • Licensed Since: 1996

Platform & Tools Comparison

The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. Interactive Brokers equips its clients with Trader Workstation (TWS), IBKR Mobile, Client Portal. OANDA, on the other hand, grants access to OANDA Trade, Advanced Charting (TradingView), MT4. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.

FeatureInteractive BrokersOANDA
MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
Proprietary EnvironmentYes (TWS, Client Portal)
Copy Trading Network

Pros & Cons: Interactive Brokers vs OANDA

Interactive Brokers
Interactive Brokers
Pros
  • Access to 150+ markets in 33 countries
  • Lowest margin rates in the industry
  • Sophisticated Trader Workstation platform
  • Real stocks, options, futures, bonds
  • SIPC insurance up to $500k
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for TWS
  • Monthly activity minimums for some accounts
  • Customer support can be impersonal
OANDA
OANDA
Pros
  • One of the few reputable brokers serving US retail clients
  • Exceptional regulatory footprint globally
  • No minimum deposit required
  • OANDA fxTrade platform is highly intuitive
  • Great historical exchange rate data and tools
Cons
  • Does not support MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
  • Spreads on Standard account aren't the tightest
  • Limited non-forex asset classes for US residents

Expert Verdict: Interactive Brokers vs OANDA

Sarah Chen
Sarah Chen
Senior Financial Analyst
As professional analysts in the forex brokerage space, we meticulously test each trading environment.

When we place Interactive Brokers and OANDA side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. Interactive Brokers, licensed since 1978, has carved out a massive niche focusing on professional traders, multi-asset investors & institutions. Their execution model heavily leans into Smart Routing / DMA, and their platform environment highlights Trader Workstation (TWS).

Conversely, OANDA, operational out of New York, USA, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts. Their $5/lot (Core Account) commission structure combined with 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.

The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is access to 150+ markets in 33 countries, and you intend to start with a minimum of $0, Interactive Brokers is the logical path forward. If, however, you value one of the few reputable brokers serving us retail clients and require OANDA Trade, OANDA edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.

Interactive Brokers vs OANDA: Frequently Asked Questions

After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Interactive Brokers** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While OANDA remains an excellent choice for us traders, beginners & data-driven analysts, Interactive Brokers proves superior due to its access to 150+ markets in 33 countries and lowest margin rates in the industry.

Interactive Brokers features an average EUR/USD spread of 0.1 pips (with commission), whereas OANDA sits at around 1.1 pips (Standard) | 0.1 pips (Core). For raw cost efficiency, Interactive Brokers.

Beginners need intuitive platforms, low minimum deposits, and great education. Interactive Brokers requires a minimum deposit of $0 and has good education. OANDA asks for $0 to start and offers good educational materials. Therefore, Interactive Brokers is arguably the better launchpad for a novice.

Yes, Interactive Brokers does not support MT4, and OANDA supports MT4.

Yes. Interactive Brokers is regulated by 5 Tier 1 authorities. OANDA holds 5 Tier 1 licenses. Both are considered highly secure for retail client capital.

Ready to Start Trading?

Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.

Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.

Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy