

FxPro vs Pepperstone (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare FxPro against Pepperstone across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Verdict: Pepperstone Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Pepperstone** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FxPro remains an excellent choice for professional european traders & ctrader enthusiasts, Pepperstone proves superior due to its top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads and exceptional platform choice including tradingview and ctrader.
FxPro vs Pepperstone: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2010 |
| Overall Rating | 4.4/5.0 | 4.8/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | $0 (Recommended $200) |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Raw+) | 1.2 pips (Standard) | 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:200 (Pro) | 1:30 (Retail) | 1:500 (Pro) | 1:30 (Retail) |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| TradingView | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Forex Pairs | 70+ | 60+ |
| Deposit Methods | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, PayPal | Bank Transfer, Credit/Debit, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller, BPay |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1 business day | 1-2 business days |
| Execution Type | NDD / STP | NDD & STP |
FxPro vs Pepperstone: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between FxPro and Pepperstone, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. FxPro offers pricing characterized by $3.50/lot (Raw+) alongside 0.0 pips (Raw+) | 1.2 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, Pepperstone utilizes a model with $3.50/lot (Razor) and 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, either broker provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | FxPro | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Raw+) | 1.2 pips (Standard) | 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) |
| Commission Defaults | $3.50/lot (Raw+) | $3.50/lot (Razor) |
| Execution Model | NDD / STP | NDD & STP |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 1 business day | 1-2 business days |
Safety & Regulation: Is FxPro or Pepperstone Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both FxPro and Pepperstone are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. FxPro is armed with 2 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2006. Pepperstone, licensed since 2010, counters with 4 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. Pepperstone holds a slight edge with more top-tier authorities. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

FxPro
Tier 1- Regulators:FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)FSCA (South Africa)SCB (Bahamas)
- Investor Protection: £85,000 (FSCS) / €20,000 (ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2006

Pepperstone
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)BaFin (Germany)DFSA (Dubai)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CY) / £85,000 (UK)
- Licensed Since: 2010
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. FxPro equips its clients with MT4, MT5, cTrader, FxPro Platform. Pepperstone, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | FxPro | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (FxPro Platform) | |
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: FxPro vs Pepperstone

FxPro
Pros
- FCA and CySEC regulated
- cTrader integration
- No dealing desk execution
- FxPro Edge proprietary platform
- Negative balance protection
Cons
- $100 minimum deposit
- Wider spreads on standard accounts
- Inactivity fee after 1 year

Pepperstone
Pros
- Top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads
- Exceptional platform choice including TradingView and cTrader
- Award-winning 24/5 customer support
- Deepest liquidity pools for large order execution
- No minimum deposit requirement
Cons
- Educational content is good but not standard-setting
- No proprietary mobile app (relies on MetaQuotes/cTrader apps)
- Lacks robust fixed-spread options
Expert Verdict: FxPro vs Pepperstone
When we place FxPro and Pepperstone side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. FxPro, licensed since 2006, has carved out a massive niche focusing on professional european traders & ctrader enthusiasts. Their execution model heavily leans into NDD / STP, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, Pepperstone, operational out of Melbourne, Australia, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for advanced traders, automated trading & tradingview enthusiasts. Their $3.50/lot (Razor) commission structure combined with 0.0 pips (Razor) | 1.0 pips (Standard) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is fca and cysec regulated, and you intend to start with a minimum of $100, FxPro is the logical path forward. If, however, you value top-tier liquidity with frequent 0.0 pip spreads and require MT4, Pepperstone edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
FxPro vs Pepperstone: Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy