

FBS vs RoboForex (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare FBS against RoboForex across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Verdict: RoboForex Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **RoboForex** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FBS remains an excellent choice for beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders, RoboForex proves superior due to its extreme leverage available up to 1:2000 and massive variety of account types including specific cent accounts.
FBS vs RoboForex: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| Overall Rating | 4.2/5.0 | 4.3/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $5 | $10 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.7 pips (Standard) | 0.0 pips (Prime) | 1.4 pips (Pro) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:2000 |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | No | Yes |
| TradingView | No | No |
| Copy Trading | Yes | Yes (CopyFX) |
| Forex Pairs | 40+ | 36+ |
| Deposit Methods | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, Local | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, WebMoney, Crypto |
| Withdrawal Speed | 15-20 minutes | Instant for most electronic methods |
| Execution Type | STP | STP / ECN |
FBS vs RoboForex: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between FBS and RoboForex, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. FBS offers pricing characterized by $0 (Spread only) alongside 0.7 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, RoboForex utilizes a model with $10/1 mio (Prime) | $0 (Pro) and 0.0 pips (Prime) | 1.4 pips (Pro) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, RoboForex provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | FBS | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.7 pips (Standard) | 0.0 pips (Prime) | 1.4 pips (Pro) |
| Commission Defaults | $0 (Spread only) | $10/1 mio (Prime) | $0 (Pro) |
| Execution Model | STP | STP / ECN |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 15-20 minutes | Instant for most electronic methods |
Safety & Regulation: Is FBS or RoboForex Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both FBS and RoboForex are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. FBS is armed with 2 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2009. RoboForex, licensed since 2009, counters with 0 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. FBS holds a slight edge in absolute tier-1 licenses. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

FBS
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)IFSC (Belize)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CySEC ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2009

RoboForex
Tier 2- Regulators:FSC (Belize)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 via Financial Commission
- Licensed Since: 2009
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. FBS equips its clients with MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App. RoboForex, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, R StocksTrader. If you rely on cTrader capabilities, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | FBS | RoboForex |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (FBS Trader) | Yes (R StocksTrader) |
| Copy Trading Network | Yes (CopyFX) |
Pros & Cons: FBS vs RoboForex

FBS
Pros
- Extremely high leverage up to 1:3000
- Low $5 minimum deposit
- Regular bonus promotions
- Cent accounts available
- Fast local bank deposits
Cons
- Offshore regulation for most clients
- Limited research tools
- Wider spreads on Standard accounts

RoboForex
Pros
- Extreme leverage available up to 1:2000
- Massive variety of account types including specific Cent accounts
- Robust proprietary CopyFX social trading system
- Daily withdrawals process very quickly
- Cashback rebate program available
Cons
- Lacks Tier-1 regulation (regulated only in Belize)
- Not available to US, UK, or EU residents natively
- Website interface is somewhat dated and cluttered
Expert Verdict: FBS vs RoboForex
When we place FBS and RoboForex side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. FBS, licensed since 2009, has carved out a massive niche focusing on beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders. Their execution model heavily leans into STP, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, RoboForex, operational out of Belize, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for high-leverage traders, automated trading & varied account types. Their $10/1 mio (Prime) | $0 (Pro) commission structure combined with 0.0 pips (Prime) | 1.4 pips (Pro) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is extremely high leverage up to 1:3000, and you intend to start with a minimum of $5, FBS is the logical path forward. If, however, you value extreme leverage available up to 1:2000 and require MT4, RoboForex edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
FBS vs RoboForex: Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy