Trading Academy
Forex Glossary
Trading Guides
News
Blog
FBS vs FP Markets (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare FBS against FP Markets across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Which is better: FBS or FP Markets?
Sources & References
- FBS Trading Accounts— FBS
- BrokerAnalysis ranking methodology— BrokerAnalysis
- BrokerAnalysis data sources— BrokerAnalysis
- BrokerAnalysis editorial policy— BrokerAnalysis
Verified promotions on this matchup
We keep this factual and secondary to safety, pricing, and platform fit. Terms still matter.
FBS
No-Deposit Bonus$100 Free No-Deposit Bonus
$100 free bonus for new clients. Also: 100% deposit bonus and $140 Level Up bonus available.
FP Markets
Cashback / RebateRefer a Friend: Earn up to $200
Referral bonus pays $50-$200 after a friend funds and trades the required volume.
Verdict: FP Markets Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **FP Markets** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FBS remains an excellent choice for beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders, FP Markets proves superior due to its true ecn pricing from 0.0 pips and asic and cysec regulated.
FBS vs FP Markets: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2005 |
| Overall Rating | 4.2/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $5 | $100 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.7 pips (Standard) | 0.0 pips (Raw) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:500 |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | No | Yes |
| TradingView | No | No |
| Copy Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Forex Pairs | 40+ | 70+ |
| Deposit Methods | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, Local | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, Crypto |
| Withdrawal Speed | 15-20 minutes | Same day to 1 business day |
| Execution Type | STP | ECN / DMA |
FBS vs FP Markets: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between FBS and FP Markets, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. FBS offers pricing characterized by $0 (Spread only) alongside 0.7 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, FP Markets utilizes a model with $3/lot (Raw) and 0.0 pips (Raw) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, FP Markets provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | FBS | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.7 pips (Standard) | 0.0 pips (Raw) |
| Commission Defaults | $0 (Spread only) | $3/lot (Raw) |
| Execution Model | STP | ECN / DMA |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | 15-20 minutes | Same day to 1 business day |
Safety & Regulation: Is FBS or FP Markets Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both FBS and FP Markets are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. FBS is armed with 2 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2009. FP Markets, licensed since 2005, counters with 2 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. They are evenly matched in terms of top-tier trust metrics. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.
FBS
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)IFSC (Belize)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CySEC ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2009
FP Markets
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)SVG FSA
- Investor Protection: Segregated client funds / €20,000 ICF
- Licensed Since: 2005
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. FBS equips its clients with MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App. FP Markets, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, cTrader, IRESS. If you rely on cTrader capabilities, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | FBS | FP Markets |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (FBS Trader) | Yes (IRESS) |
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: FBS vs FP Markets
FBS
Pros
- Extremely high leverage up to 1:3000
- Low $5 minimum deposit
- Regular bonus promotions
- Cent accounts available
- Fast local bank deposits
Cons
- Offshore regulation for most clients
- Limited research tools
- Wider spreads on Standard accounts
FP Markets
Pros
- True ECN pricing from 0.0 pips
- ASIC and CySEC regulated
- cTrader and IRESS platforms
- Over 10,000 tradable instruments
- Excellent execution speeds
Cons
- $100 minimum deposit
- IRESS platform has additional fees
- Limited educational content
Expert Verdict: FBS vs FP Markets
When we place FBS and FP Markets side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. FBS, licensed since 2009, has carved out a massive niche focusing on beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders. Their execution model heavily leans into STP, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, FP Markets, operational out of Sydney, Australia, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for ecn traders, scalpers & australian clients. Their $3/lot (Raw) commission structure combined with 0.0 pips (Raw) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is extremely high leverage up to 1:3000, and you intend to start with a minimum of $5, FBS is the logical path forward. If, however, you value true ecn pricing from 0.0 pips and require MT4, FP Markets edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
FBS vs FP Markets: Frequently Asked Questions
People Also Search For
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Editorial Policy | Data Sources | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy