

Exness vs FBS (2026): Which Broker Is Actually Better?
We compare Exness against FBS across spreads, regulations, platforms, and trading costs. Read our algorithmic breakdown and expert verdict to find out which broker suits your trading style in 2026.
Verdict: Exness Wins
After exhaustive side-by-side testing, **Exness** emerges as the overall winner in this matchup. While FBS remains an excellent choice for beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders, Exness proves superior due to its ultra-tight spreads from 0.0 pips and instant automated withdrawals 24/7.
Exness vs FBS: Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2009 |
| Overall Rating | 4.8/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 |
| Minimum Deposit | $1 | $5 |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Raw) | 1.0 pips (Standard) | 0.7 pips (Standard) |
| Maximum Leverage | 1:Unlimited | 1:3000 |
| MetaTrader 4 | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | No | No |
| TradingView | No | No |
| Copy Trading | Yes | Yes |
| Forex Pairs | 100+ | 40+ |
| Deposit Methods | Bank, Card, Skrill, Neteller, Crypto, Local | Card, Bank, Skrill, Neteller, Local |
| Withdrawal Speed | Instant | 15-20 minutes |
| Execution Type | Market Execution | STP |
Exness vs FBS: Fee Breakdown
When comparing the trading costs between Exness and FBS, it's essential to look beyond just the advertised spreads. We must factor in commissions, swap rates, and non-trading fees like deposit or inactivity charges. Exness offers pricing characterized by $3.50/lot (Raw Spread) alongside 0.0 pips (Raw) | 1.0 pips (Standard) spreads. In contrast, FBS utilizes a model with $0 (Spread only) and 0.7 pips (Standard) spreads. For active, high-volume traders, Exness provides the superior cost-efficiency curve.
| Fee Type | Exness | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD Spread | 0.0 pips (Raw) | 1.0 pips (Standard) | 0.7 pips (Standard) |
| Commission Defaults | $3.50/lot (Raw Spread) | $0 (Spread only) |
| Execution Model | Market Execution | STP |
| Deposit Fees | None | None |
| Withdrawal Speed | Instant | 15-20 minutes |
Safety & Regulation: Is Exness or FBS Safer?
Trust is paramount in forex trading. Both Exness and FBS are highly regulated entities, but their jurisdictional footprints differ. Exness is armed with 2 Tier-1 licenses and has been securing client funds since 2008. FBS, licensed since 2009, counters with 2 Tier-1 regulatory bodies overseeing its operations. They are evenly matched in terms of top-tier trust metrics. Both brokers employ strict client fund segregation.

Exness
Tier 1- Regulators:FCA (UK)CySEC (Cyprus)FSCA (South Africa)FSA (Seychelles)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (EU ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2008

FBS
Tier 1- Regulators:ASIC (Australia)CySEC (Cyprus)IFSC (Belize)
- Investor Protection: Up to €20,000 (CySEC ICF)
- Licensed Since: 2009
Platform & Tools Comparison
The software you trade on dictates your execution speed and analytical depth. Both brokers provide industry stalwarts, but divergencies exist. Exness equips its clients with MT4, MT5, Exness Terminal, Exness Trade App. FBS, on the other hand, grants access to MT4, MT5, FBS Trader App. If you rely on third-party EA automation, this section heavily dictates your broker choice.
| Feature | Exness | FBS |
|---|---|---|
| MetaTrader 4 | ||
| MetaTrader 5 | ||
| cTrader | ||
| TradingView | ||
| Proprietary Environment | Yes (FBS Trader) | |
| Copy Trading Network |
Pros & Cons: Exness vs FBS

Exness
Pros
- Ultra-tight spreads from 0.0 pips
- Instant automated withdrawals 24/7
- Unlimited leverage options
- Free VPS for active traders
- Excellent proprietary mobile app
Cons
- No cTrader or TradingView integration
- Educational resources are relatively basic
- Not available to US clients

FBS
Pros
- Extremely high leverage up to 1:3000
- Low $5 minimum deposit
- Regular bonus promotions
- Cent accounts available
- Fast local bank deposits
Cons
- Offshore regulation for most clients
- Limited research tools
- Wider spreads on Standard accounts
Expert Verdict: Exness vs FBS
When we place Exness and FBS side-by-side, we observe two distinct philosophies in client servicing. Exness, licensed since 2008, has carved out a massive niche focusing on low-cost traders, high-volume day traders & scalpers. Their execution model heavily leans into Market Execution, and their platform environment highlights MT4.
Conversely, FBS, operational out of Belize, has architected its infrastructure predominantly for beginners, bonus hunters & high-leverage traders. Their $0 (Spread only) commission structure combined with 0.7 pips (Standard) spreads makes them a formidable competitor.
The Bottom Line: If your primary directive is ultra-tight spreads from 0.0 pips, and you intend to start with a minimum of $1, Exness is the logical path forward. If, however, you value extremely high leverage up to 1:3000 and require MT4, FBS edges out the competition and earns our recommendation.
Exness vs FBS: Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Start Trading?
Open a free demo account with either broker to test their platforms risk-free.
Risk Warning: Forex and CFD trading involves significant risk of loss. 68–80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.|Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive compensation from the brokers listed on this page. This does not influence our rankings or reviews, which are based on independent analysis.
Comparison data updated February 2026. Broker terms, spreads, and conditions vary by region and account type. See our methodology | Full Disclaimer | Privacy Policy